Local AI Coding Assistant: Run Your Own Copilot

Written by Jakub Rusinowski · Last updated 2026-07-12 · Hardware figures computed by our VRAM engine

A local AI coding assistant is three choices: a model (Qwen3-Coder, Devstral-2, Qwen 3.6 — picked by your VRAM), a tool (Continue for Copilot-style assist, Cline or Aider for autonomous agents, Tabby for teams), and the hardware to serve it. This hub covers all three, with every hardware figure computed by the same engine as our GPU checker.

Coding is the local-AI use case where the argument is strongest — code is the data companies least want leaving the building, coding assistants are subscription products you can actually replace, and 2026's open coding models are good enough that the replacement isn't a downgrade for everyday work.

It's also where hardware questions get sharpest. An autocomplete model must answer in milliseconds; an agentic model must hold a repo's worth of context; both must fit your VRAM at once. The guides below are organized so you can enter anywhere — by model, by tool, or by hardware — and each one links the others.

The stack in 30 seconds

ModelVRAM (Q4)Runs onContextLicense
Qwen3-Coder 8B
Entry (8 GB GPU) — Current-gen coder + autocomplete on any modern GPU or 16 GB Mac.
ollama pull qwen3-coder:8b
5.6 GB8 GB GPU (RTX 3060/4060)
Mac: 16 GB unified
125KApache-2.0
Devstral-2 22B
Mid (16 GB GPU) — The best dedicated coding agent under 24 GB. Apache 2.0.
ollama pull devstral:22b
14.1 GB16 GB GPU (RTX 4060 Ti 16GB / 5060 Ti)
Mac: 24 GB unified
125KApache-2.0
Qwen 3.6 27B
Sweet spot (24 GB GPU) — The realistic daily driver for local agentic coding on a 3090/4090.
ollama pull qwen3.6:27b
17.6 GB24 GB GPU (RTX 3090/4090)
Mac: 24 GB unified
256KApache-2.0
Qwen3-Coder 80B-A3B (MoE)
Workstation / Mac 96 GB+ — ~96% of the open flagship’s quality, self-hostable, fast MoE.
ollama pull qwen3-coder:80b-a3b-q4
49.1 GB2×48 GB GPUs / big unified memory
Mac: 96 GB unified
125KApache-2.0

The guides

Frequently asked questions

Can I really replace GitHub Copilot with a local model?
For autocomplete, chat, and inline edits — yes: Continue.dev plus a FIM-tuned local model (Qwen3-Coder, StarCoder2) reproduces the Copilot experience offline, and on a 16–24 GB GPU the quality gap has become marginal for mainstream languages. Frontier cloud models still lead on the hardest multi-file agent tasks, which is why many developers run local-first with an API fallback.
What hardware do I need for a local coding assistant?
Entry: any 8 GB GPU or a 16 GB Apple Silicon Mac runs Qwen3-Coder 8B plus autocomplete. Sweet spot: a 24 GB card (RTX 3090/4090) runs Qwen 3.6 27B — the tier where local agentic coding gets genuinely good. Workstation: 2×24 GB or a 96–128 GB Mac runs Qwen3-Coder 80B-A3B. Check your exact GPU with our free compatibility checker.
Which tool should I use: Continue, Cline, Aider, or Tabby?
Continue if you want a Copilot replacement (autocomplete + chat in VS Code/JetBrains). Cline if you want an autonomous agent that plans and edits multiple files. Aider if you live in the terminal and want git-native agent workflows. Tabby if you are provisioning one self-hosted server for a whole team. They are not mutually exclusive — Continue + Cline is a common pairing.
What is the best local coding model right now?
Per hardware tier: Qwen3-Coder 8B on 8 GB, Devstral-2 22B on 16 GB, Qwen 3.6 27B or Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B on 24 GB, and Qwen3-Coder 80B-A3B at workstation scale. The open frontier (DeepSeek V4-Pro, GLM, Kimi K2) is stronger still but needs datacenter hardware — see our dated Report #2 for the full landscape.
Is a local coding assistant cheaper than Copilot or Cursor?
If you already own a capable GPU — immediately: electricity for all-day coding inference is a few dollars a month versus $10/month (Copilot Pro) or $20/month (Cursor Pro) indefinitely. If you are buying hardware for it, a used RTX 3090 pays back against a Cursor subscription in roughly three years — so buy for the privacy and control, and treat the subscription savings as a bonus.

Keep going