Best Local LLMs for Reasoning

作者: Jakub Rusinowski · 最后更新: 2026年6月26日

Problems that need explicit multi-step thinking: planning, analysis, and chains of inference rather than recall.

Top pick: Gemma 4 27B ⭐

Scores 98.2/100 for reasoning and multi-step problem solving. 27B parameters, needing about 17.1 GB at Q4_K_M, 125K context, Gemma License (commercial OK).

Ranked for reasoning and multi-step problem solving

ModelScoreParamsContextLicenceQuality index
1. Gemma 4 27B ⭐98.227B125KGemma License (commercial OK)— (estimated)
2. GLM-4.7 / GLM-Z1 GLM-Z1 32B (Reasoning)97.332B125KApache-2.0— (estimated)
3. GLM-5.1 72B96.472B125KMIT— (estimated)
4. Qwen 3 32B96.333B125KApache 2.0— (estimated)
5. Qwen 3.7 35B-A3B96.135B256KApache-2.0— (estimated)
6. Gemma 4 31B95.931B250KApache-2.0— (estimated)

Frontier open-weight models (multi-GPU / private cloud)

These also score for reasoning and multi-step problem solving, but none runs on a single consumer GPU or workstation, so they are listed apart rather than ranked against the local picks above.

Best pick for your memory budget

The strongest model overall is rarely the right answer — what matters is the strongest model that fits the memory you have. These picks are re-ranked per tier, so each one uses its budget rather than simply being small.

MemoryTypical hardwareRecommended models
8 GBRTX 4060, RTX 3070, base MacBook AirDeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 8B (94.8)
Ternary Bonsai 27B (94.1)
Qwen 3 8B (93.1)
12 GBRTX 3060 12 GB, RTX 5070Qwen 3 14B (96)
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B (94.4)
Qwen 3.5 14B (94)
16 GBRTX 5080, RTX 4080, RX 9070 XTQwen 3 14B (96)
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B (94.2)
Qwen 3.5 14B (93.8)
24 GBRTX 4090, RTX 3090, RX 7900 XTXGemma 4 27B ⭐ (100)
GLM-4.7 / GLM-Z1 GLM-Z1 32B (Reasoning) (99.2)
Qwen 3 32B (98.3)
48 GBRTX 6000 Ada, MacBook Pro M4 Max 48 GBGLM-5.1 72B (100)
Gemma 4 27B ⭐ (98.1)
GLM-4.7 / GLM-Z1 GLM-Z1 32B (Reasoning) (97.7)
128 GB+Mac Studio, DGX Spark, multi-GPUGLM-5.1 72B (98.4)
Qwen 3.5 122B-A10B (MoE) (97)
Gemma 4 27B ⭐ (95.9)

How this ranking works

Reasoning score dominates at 75%. The quality floor is the strictest of any workload (65) because a weak reasoning model is not merely slower — it is confidently wrong. Latency is deliberately down-weighted to 0.3: reasoning models emit long thinking traces, so tokens/sec matters less than whether the conclusion is right.

Worked example — Gemma 4 27B ⭐: capability 94.4 × 0.44, quality 92.7 × 0.259, context 97.3 × 0.168, license 70 × 0.035, accessibility 80 × 0.097 + 6 tag bonus (reasoning, complex-tasks).

Requirements applied: context floor 16,384 tokens (ideal 131,072), quality floor 65, licence weight 0.3, latency weight 0.3.

Running reasoning and multi-step problem solving locally

FAQ

What is the best local LLM for reasoning and multi-step problem solving?

Gemma 4 27B ⭐, scoring 98.2/100 against this workload's published requirements. 157 models qualified.

What hardware do I need for reasoning and multi-step problem solving?

A credible answer starts at 8 GB of memory. Larger budgets unlock materially stronger models — the table above lists the best pick at each tier.

How were these models ranked?

Reasoning score dominates at 75%. The quality floor is the strictest of any workload (65) because a weak reasoning model is not merely slower — it is confidently wrong. Latency is deliberately down-weighted to 0.3: reasoning models emit long thinking traces, so tokens/sec matters less than whether the conclusion is right.

Hardware for This Workload

Related Workloads

Top Pick

Tools

← All workloads | Check your hardware