← Full benchmark database
Value leaderboard

Performance, cost, power and VRAM — weighted by what you actually value

Four axes for Qwen 3 8B, each normalised across the hardware shown, so you can see at a glance where a machine is strong and where it gives something up.

There is no score here until you make one. A single blended number with weights we picked would look objective while hiding an opinion you never saw — so the default is the four axes, and the ranking appears once you say what matters to you. Your weights go in the URL, so a link you share shows what you valued.

Machines that run it108Qwen 3 8B at Q4_K_M, 4K context
Fastest238 tok/sNVIDIA H100 80GB (SXM)
Most efficient1.50 tok/WApple M5 Max · SoC power
1 measured17 modelled on a constant fitted from real runs90 on a constant nobody has calibrated
Q4_K_M · 4K context · decode speed

What do you actually want from this machine?

Pick a starting point — each is an opinion, named for the person it suits — or set the sliders yourself. Nothing is ranked until you do.

HardwareSpeedRunning costEfficiencyMemoryEvidence
0.03
0.40
0.07
0.05
0.09
0.33
0.05
0.24
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.37
0.00
0.58
0.13
0.02
0.12
0.97
0.78
0.11
0.05
0.83
0.34
0.05
0.25
0.95
0.70
0.24
0.01
0.75
0.24
0.03
0.12
0.92
0.54
0.17
0.05
0.83
0.34
0.05
0.25
0.95
0.70
0.37
0.01
0.71
0.21
0.03
0.12
0.95
0.63
0.24
0.09
0.89
0.46
0.17
0.03
0.75
0.24
0.06
0.25
0.96
0.70
1.00
0.02
0.78
0.27
0.05
0.17
0.99
0.85
0.24
0.13
0.95
0.63
0.06
0.08
0.91
0.50
0.03
0.03
0.84
0.35
0.05
0.19
1.00
1.00
0.24
0.14
0.97
0.70
0.06
0.09
0.93
0.57
0.11
0.36
0.88
0.43
1.00
0.04
0.84
0.36
0.05
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.12
0.36
0.06
0.00
0.15
0.30
0.04
0.01
0.20
0.44
0.07
0.05
0.20
0.35
0.05
0.05
0.07
0.56
0.12
0.02
0.15
0.26
0.04
0.03
0.22
0.66
0.17
0.03
0.60
0.76
0.25
0.14
0.14
0.42
0.07
0.24
0.14
0.47
0.08
0.24
0.75
0.78
0.27
0.14
1.00
0.60
0.13
0.14
0.14
0.52
0.10
0.24
0.17
0.84
0.35
0.03
0.44
0.63
0.15
0.08
0.44
0.55
0.11
0.08
0.24
0.70
0.19
0.05
0.24
0.27
0.04
0.05
0.24
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.29
0.42
0.07
0.08
0.13
0.30
0.04
0.01
0.17
0.33
0.05
0.00
0.17
0.25
0.04
0.00
0.23
0.25
0.03
0.00
0.28
0.32
0.04
0.00
0.33
0.37
0.06
0.01
0.33
0.37
0.06
0.01
0.19
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.34
0.39
0.06
0.03
0.36
0.23
0.03
0.03
0.15
0.62
0.15
0.00
0.14
0.60
0.13
0.00
0.16
0.44
0.07
0.02
0.16
0.47
0.08
0.00
0.28
0.62
0.14
0.01
0.28
0.57
0.12
0.01
0.28
0.40
0.07
0.01
0.36
0.56
0.11
0.02
0.38
0.52
0.10
0.02
0.24
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.39
0.53
0.10
0.02
0.58
0.55
0.11
0.03
0.31
0.78
0.28
0.02
0.31
0.56
0.12
0.05
0.16
0.60
0.13
0.00
0.23
0.69
0.19
0.00
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.23
0.58
0.13
0.02
0.23
0.58
0.13
0.00
0.33
0.59
0.13
0.01
0.20
0.78
0.27
0.00
0.42
0.61
0.14
0.02
0.33
0.88
0.43
0.01
0.45
0.54
0.11
0.02
0.42
0.87
0.40
0.02
0.70
0.52
0.10
0.05
0.42
0.87
0.40
0.03
0.48
0.67
0.17
0.08
0.28
0.55
0.11
0.03
0.28
0.38
0.06
0.08
0.14
0.81
0.31
0.02
0.33
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.22
0.91
0.49
0.03
0.42
0.78
0.27
0.05
0.58
0.74
0.23
0.08
0.58
0.74
0.23
0.13
0.42
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.70
0.49
0.09
0.17
0.70
0.00
0.00
0.17
0.10
0.15
0.01
0.00
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.16
0.11
0.01
0.01
0.22
0.32
0.04
0.02
0.21
0.27
0.04
0.02
0.28
0.33
0.04
0.02
0.32
0.34
0.05
0.03
0.12
0.32
0.04
0.02
0.12
0.37
0.06
0.00
0.24
0.50
0.10
0.02
0.17
0.27
0.04
0.01
0.24
0.26
0.04
0.02

SoC marks the 30 unified-memory systems in this ranking. Their power figure is whole-package power — CPU, GPU and memory controller on one die — where a discrete card reports board power for the card alone. Neither is the wall draw of the complete machine. They are not the same measurement, so read the ranking as a real difference in efficiency that is partly a difference in what is being counted.

How this is calculated

Decode speed comes from the same engine as the rest of the site — a three-term latency model with efficiency fitted per GPU architecture. Full methodology

each axis is min-max normalised across the hardware shown:
  axis = (value - min) / (max - min)          0 = weakest, 1 = strongest

cost is inverted first, so higher is better on all four axes.
an axis every row agrees on scores 0 -- it carries no information,
and scoring it 1 would let a flat axis dominate your composite.

composite = SUM(axis x your_weight) / SUM(your_weights)

Watts is the heat, and the heat is the noise — but the mapping between them is the cooler's job, and we hold no cooler data. A 450 W card in a well-designed case can be quieter than a 250 W card with a bad fan curve, so nothing here should be read as a loudness ranking. If you own a sound meter, we would like your reading.

购买此硬件 Apple MacBook Pro M5 Max — 128 GB unified memory · 614 GB/s立即云端部署 RunPod 上的 RTX 4090 — 低至 $0.34/小时 · 价格核实于 2026-07

或在 Vast.ai 比较,低至 $0.35/小时 (typical low · varies)

作为亚马逊联盟成员,我们从符合条件的购买中获得收入。云 GPU 链接为推荐链接——我们可能获得佣金,您无需额外付费。

Tokens per wattCost per 1M tokensThe full databaseWhat running LLMs 24/7 costs